When Nonprofit Boards Discover Executive Director Misconduct

A nonprofit board’s worst nightmare is the discovery of financial malfeasance or gross violation of personnel laws by the chief executive officer. While staff do make unfounded complaints about an executive director (ED), cases of significant management shortcomings are sadly on the rise. Factors contributing to this increase are human resource litigation; over-lean staffing; lack of professional management training; and the increasing pressure of sustaining today’s nonprofits. Many nonprofits never develop the mechanisms needed to mount an affirmative defense to employee lawsuits. An affirmative defense requires policies and comprehensive records which are well-maintained and secured. Regarding financial challenges, nonprofit management has always required attention to cash flow. Current funding scarcity, budget cuts and revenue delays mean that organizations without strict, effective cash management practices are pushed to the financial edge with little warning. Specific causative factors that allow situations to develop into disasters include:

Immediate attention

When the board is notified of an employee’s intent to sue for executive director misconduct or when a vendor hires an attorney to collect an outstanding payable, there are certain precautions needed to avoid insolvency and/or damaging public relations. One message to convey repeatedly is that the board has commissioned an investigation which will be thorough and unbiased. You can also reassure internal and external parties that if the allegations are without merit the alleged “offender” will be reinstated without prejudice. The following list is not meant to convey specific management or legal advice but is offered as a list of ideas for a board to consider. It’s imperative that a nonprofit facing serious employee misconduct charges, consult their legal and financial representatives for professional guidance and to follow all organization policies that might apply. This is especially important if litigation is anticipated. Among the points for the board to consider and discuss:

The “Offending” Executive Director

If the misconduct is financial

If the issue is Human Resources oriented

Contracts and Reporting

Board Governance

Again, these items are meant to remind the board of matters they must consider. If you are a board member facing such an allegation of executive director misconduct, engage an experienced nonprofit management consultant or attorney and follow their advice. They will be more objective than you can be and will be able to warn you of what to expect. In my experience, after meeting with an upset, worried board the overwhelming feeling is relief that someone with experience is there to offer clear, objective support. Good luck!